Hi everyone,
I’m currently working looking to integrate the Qorvo QPA2612 (8-12 GHz, 12W GaN-on-SiC) for our PA stage.
My primary challenge is that we need to run this amplifier in Continuous Wave (CW) mode, and I’m looking for some real-world sanity checks on my thermal and RF layout math before we spin a very expensive board.
Here is the current design context:
- The Heat Load: Running at the recommended 24V bias, aiming for ~12W RF output, I’m calculating roughly 15W to 16W of continuous heat dissipation.
- The Cooling Solution: We are using an active cooling loop (cold plate and copper coin under thermal pad of the PA).
- The Component Choice: I initially looked at the 5W QPA2611, but its internal thermal resistance is nearly 10 °C/W. The 12W QPA2612 actually seems easier to cool because its is an incredible ~2.8 °C/W, meaning the thermal bottleneck is entirely on my PCB layout.
I’m hoping to get some advice on a few specific areas from anyone who has worked with this Qorvo family (QPA2610/11/12):
1. CW Performance vs. Datasheet Pulsed Curves
Almost all the large-signal performance plots in the datasheet (PAE, Output Power, Drain Current) are characterized using a 100 µs pulse width at a 10% duty cycle. Has anyone run the QPA2612 hard in CW? Assuming I can keep the baseplate strictly clamped at 50°C or lower, does the continuous thermal steady-state cause any severe gain droop or efficiency penalties that aren’t captured in the pulsed graphs?
2. PCB Thermal Path: Embedded Copper Coin vs. Via Array
To handle the 16W of CW heat through the 5x5 mm QFN center paddle, a standard 1.6 mm PCB via array seems like it will introduce too much thermal resistance (estimating ~2.0 °C/W, which costs me 32°C right off the bat).
- I am heavily considering using an embedded solid copper coin in the PCB to mate the backside paddle directly to the cold plate.
- The RF Question: Does a solid copper coin introduce any parasitic inductance issues for the RF ground at 12 GHz compared to a tightly packed, plated-through microvia array?
3. General Layout Traps
Are there any quirks with the QPA261x package or matching that I should watch out for?
Any insights, battle scars, or application notes you can share would be hugely appreciated!
Thanks in advance.