Hi everyone,
We are currently considering using the Qorvo DM1000 in a new design, but I have some concerns about its long-term availability.
Does anyone know whether the DM1000 is still considered a suitable choice for a new design? I have seen information suggesting that the End-of-Life (EOL) date may be around 2028. Can anyone confirm whether this is correct?
Any information or experience with the DM1000’s lifecycle status would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
Hello, are you asking about the DW1000 (standalone UWB transceiver), DWM1000 (UWB transceiver + antenna), or DWM1001 (UWB transceiver + Nordic BLE MCU + antenna)?
Hello, thanks for your response! I was referring to the DW1000 (UWB transceiver + internal antenna) module.
DW1000 is just the chip, no antenna and not a module.
DWM1000 is a module with the DW1000 IC, an antenna, a crystal and a few power supply parts. Still has the same SPI interface as the chip and so from a firmware perspective the DW1000 and DWM1000 are virtually identical. However the DWM with the built in antenna and support components makes board design a lot simpler.
I am actually referring to the Qorvo DWM1000 module , not the individual DW1000 chip .
Our question is whether the DWM1000 module is still a sensible choice for a new design, particularly regarding its long-term availability. I have seen information suggesting an EOL date around 2028 and would like to know if anyone can confirm this.
If this is correct, is there a recommended successor or alternative module that would be more suitable for a new design?
Thanks for the clarification!
The DWM3000 module is the newer variant of DWM1000
I know there’s a newer DWM3000 module, which is why I’m asking specifically about the DWM1000—since there are significant differences in the software.
I’m not qorvo but as long as the DW1000 IC is still available then it would always be possible to create your own DWM1000 compatible module if needed. Of course at that point it may make more sense to design the chip directly in to your system rather than using a module.
But it also means that there is a possibility of some 3rd party creating a drop in replacement if they feel there is a market.
I suppose my view is that if you are only making a low number of things then if the module is due to go end of life just buy a stock, they aren’t that expensive. If you are looking at higher volumes then design the chip in, it’s a bit more design complexity up front but cheaper in the long run.
I agree that the DWM3000 isn’t “a newer variant”, it’s a different part with different capabilities and different firmware. It may be newer but it’s not a replacement.