Possible approach to learn from scrach If you agree

QSPICE
1

The reason for the approach is my frustration of the many options that I have to respond to while manually drawing the schematic. With the arriaval of AI and ChatGPT ( among others) there must be a way. Here is the steps:

  1. have a drawing of the simple circuit (see attachment)
    cw97
    cw971218×599 185 KB
  2. ask for schematic file creation from somewhere based on the schematic
  3. start the project with the created schematic file.
  4. Start playing and here where the real learning starts.

I hope I explained the approach well enough to either help me out or kill it.

2

@arishy ,

Hi. It true that learning new things are a great goal.

I’m not sure what you are asking with your question in the forum. It appears you are suggesting a future improvement of QSpice? AI generation of schematics?

Note: I’ve created a simple schematic (attached) from your drawing to included. Effectively it won’t achieve your goal because the bridge rectifier you inserted is “upside-down”. The Bridge “+” is connected to the ‘-’ node and the Bridge “-” is connected to the “+” node.

I’ve included a second circuit on the schematic with the zeners and the polarized Cap flipped. This gives you the 12V (pseudo-regulated) circuit you intended.

Len
Arishy_Idea.qsch (17.9 KB)

3

I am delighted. Your response was much more than I expected. I will split your response in two parts:

  1. The proposed approach can be understood as a request for future addition, but that was not my intention. I was hoping that someone or some company has developed such conversion. The technology of Interpreting a graph has come a long way now (not as good as interpreting voice to text)…
    What is funny is I tried using Google Gimini and the result was disaster; simply because the topic (The Spice world) is almost exclusive to the very elite field of simulation. It has a lingo of its own.

As I mentioned in my post, the QSpice offers a lot of justifiable options that confuse the beginner…

I am an old timer (IT field) and this “language” can be compared to the basic assembly language that kicked off the present collection of programming languages. I can keep going on this topic but this is not the place for it.
2. your schema that you kindly did for me ( I will test it and I hope you will be able to handle hold me to get it done).

It is a simple circuit and you can safely correct the errors because it is COMMON CIRCUIT.

Thank you again for your response